DynamicPageList3 Manual talk:Feedback: Difference between revisions

From DynamicPageList3 Manual
Content added Content deleted
m (Lens0021 moved page DynamicPageList3 Manual:Feedback to DynamicPageList3 Manual talk:Feedback: Hopefully to fix the fact this page is not treated as a talk page)
(__TOC__)
Line 1: Line 1:
__TOC__
== Place to discourse ==
== Place to discourse ==



Revision as of 11:23, 27 March 2022

Place to discourse

Hello, it could be good if there is a place to discourse something on this wiki. For example, requests for enabling extensions. --Lens0021 (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Requests for enabling Extensions currently may be easiest by asking Cosmic Alpha (CA) on MH Discord. Which extensions are you wanting enabled (I can add them to my existing ask if they make good sense)?
At this moment, I'm just starting to get content brought over for CA, and some unnecessary templates cleaned up/replaced (I'm not importing because I'm not sure we need all of Fandom's templates, instead I'm manually copying and stripping out some unnecessary bits to simplify). It may be a bit early for feedback as of yet, given we don't even have all the content here. I'm also rejigging the page structure, since on Fandom the content was in a custom Extensions namespace and had nested as subpages, which isn't needed here. I don't have access yet to put the necessary CSS in MediaWiki:Common.css, so the navigation template is going to look very strange to anyone else but me (the styles are missing that I have in my user common.css that need to be moved to MediaWiki:Common.css). I also plan to suggest a "more examples" link for each parameter section, as modelled after one of the older manuals to help users better understand different ways a parameter might be used to achieve specific goals). Though CA doesn't want the old manual format, this one bit can be a very useful carryover perhaps (their examples were easier to follow because there were many more of them, plus users could test and ask questions on each example's talk pages). FrozenPlum (talk) 21:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
To be clear, CA has said he wants the Gamepedia manual format as a starting place (that he will edit/change etc afterwards), so that's what I'm doing. Until all the content is here, rearranging everything is just going to complicate those efforts. Please be patient, thanks. FrozenPlum (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
I've been granted (temporary) ManageWiki permissions now to enable extensions, so I'm not being a pest to CA lol, and I'm happy to enable as desired. Per your question here, I believe CA said he wanted to avoid putting things on main page or in the nav, until the content is fleshed out (understandable, he mentioned this in Discord). I think it's so he can rearrange, correct etc., as desired first (and right now, I'm just moving over old content). This page works great to discuss things if it works for you, thanks for creating!
At the moment, I realized in my copying I forgot to attribute in edit summary (as is required of copy/pasting content) so had gone back to rectify that. I haven't filled out template documentation in some templates in case they're overhauled (but you're welcome to add template data regardless or simplify too). Or, if there's anything specific you'd like to work on, that's great, perhaps we can coordinate our efforts here? I haven't begun to look at what parameter information will need updating yet, CA just mentioned to not add anything to documentation relating to %EDITSUMMARY% because that doesn't work right now (and he's not sure he'll be able to fix it). Also, he said he recently added a feature for |openreferences=missing to only show redlinks, that isn't in the Fandom/Gamepedia documentation either (possibly we may need to avoid that until more is known, but I'm not sure on that one). Cheers FrozenPlum (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, I misread his discord comment, we can add stuff to the nav bar, though I'd personally prefer to do that when the pages exist and function correctly, if that makes sense. FrozenPlum (talk) 02:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Which extensions are you wanting enabled

I have several ideas and am not sure that listing all extensions is good, anyway:
  • DiscussionTools - Tools to enhance discussion pages. Includes auto signature, real-time preview of wikitext, and subscription of each topic. This is also being used on Wikimedia projects.
  • Linter - Dependency of DiscussionTools
  • VisualEditor - Dependency of DiscussionTools
  • TemplateStyles - It reduces the need for editing MediaWiki:Common.css by users.

It may be a bit early for feedback as of yet, given we don't even have all the content here.

I named this page lightly. It is OK to pick up another word and move this page.

I don't have access yet to put the necessary CSS in MediaWiki:Common.css, so the navigation template is going to look very strange to anyone else but me (the styles are missing that I have in my user common.css that need to be moved to MediaWiki:Common.css).

I believe it is a good practice to get rid as possible of contents of MediaWiki:Common.css that are for templates, in favor of TemplateStyles. See Help:TemplateStyles for futher infomation.

To be clear, CA has said he wants the Gamepedia manual format as a starting place (that he will edit/change etc afterwards), so that's what I'm doing. Until all the content is here, rearranging everything is just going to complicate those efforts. Please be patient, thanks.

Thank you for clearfiyng. I will.
Thank you --Lens0021 (talk) 06:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


You're welcome, and thanks for adding the extension names! These are now enabled. I see they are also enabled on meta, so I felt comfortable enabling here. My apologies, I'm being over-cautious only because it's not my wiki and my bureaucrat privileges are temporary. This no doubt makes me too overcautious towards changing too much while its owner is away, lol. Ah, thanks also for the link to clarify about template styles, we don't use it on our wiki because our templates are locked down, so I wasn't familiar with why it would be desired in this context. Makes much better sense now though, cheers. :) FrozenPlum (talk) 07:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)